Friday, January 25, 2008

The Arrogance of Wealth and Power

"Davos" is the epitome of that syndrome. Rich and powerful people meet in a resort to discuss the "world economy", viz., how they can control the common man and bend him to their wishes. Is increasing human freedom a pillar of their goals ? ... No. Is increasing human culture and knowledge a goal ? ... No. They network among each other to exchange thinking on how to maintain and increase their control over ... the rest of us. Every year Davos makes me want to puke.

Then I read in the WSJ that Bill Gates wants to "change capitalism". Hmmm, the world's wealthiest person who become wealthy running a de facto monopoly wants to tell us how to change "capitalism". I don't think he really knows what word the means. That word, "capitalism" is unfortunately a Marxist word for an economic system in contraposition to socialism and communism. "Capitalism" is not simply a system with private capital employed for increasing wealth, but is a label for the entire free private property system where a free man or woman can "own" things and do with them what they please. What people think of as "capitalism" is an effect of this human freedom which developed in the early 19th century as free people found ways to band together and use resources more effectively by sharing and exchanging risks and ideas.

So efforts to "change capitalism" are simply stupid. What does that mean ? If it means anything other than trying to get leaders to "freely" adjust business practices, then it is really a limitation on human freedom. Now some limits on human freedom are fine with me, namely those that prevent the rich & powerful from using their positions to dominate the common man and become new feudal lords. Or to manipulate the dynamics of markets to create fear and intimidate the common man. That's how feudalism began ... good fighting men used their skills to dominate farmers into giving up their own freedom and lands and accepting "protection".

So is Davos about actually helping people .. or is it about using and creating fear so "they" can become new Dukes & Barons ? I think it's a bit of both, but the well-meaning fools seeking the former are being used as cover by those knaves seeking the latter. Are restrictions on the rich and powerful a subject at Davos ? What about regulation of hedge funds ? If they want to discuss how to control themselves, fine, that's an admirable topic. Otherwise, they should shut up and leave us alone.

PS: Futures are up at 5AM ET. MSFT had good earnings. Gold is up. Oil is back over $90. I am about 200% long with some reserves to deploy IF we get another dip. I made a lot of reallocation trades yesterday. My Alpha Fund positions are BAC, WB, GE, JPM, C, GOOG, CVX, DVN, RTP, PCU, AAPL, BHP, RIO, RIG, DO, SU, HDB, IBN, MRO, VLO, BTU, FCX, CCJ, EDU, in rough size order. The largest is over 20x the size of the smaller. I have to sell some gold in the Krypto Fund and buy stocks. Gold is way overweight there. I might do that today, but since it's physical gold, I have to do it in small bits.

PPS: I'm holding a barf bag and puking, seeing Maria, Gates, Dell & Bono blab. Arghhh !

41 comments:

  1. going to do a knife fighting workout ... K-bar & all

    ReplyDelete
  2. good workout ... the Kbar felt good in my hand. Got some good combo move work, too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. there sure seems like a lot of double counting in this loss estimation game.

    ReplyDelete
  4. barf?

    helping save lives in africa ........the worlds poorest and neediest

    i love what they are doing......especially bono....what a hero


    of course someone like you will find that disgusting and offensive


    i'm sure frosty also thinks helping aids victims in africa is a waste of money.....after all....they are black

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bunkerman I don't see any rails/shippers in the Alpha Fund....have you considered putting such positions into the fund?

    ReplyDelete
  6. mfl59 ... I had some of those [BNI, YRCW, GNK, DSX] before and took the losses to concentrate more $ in the big fins. So yes, I like them a lot. No room now as I am keeping sopme reserves in case Ben betrays us again.

    They've bounced nicely so I have sellers remorse. If they dip I might pick them up again if Ben comes thru next week. I have a bit of room.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You are so naive, Bud. They can do whatever tehy want with their money. But what is the purpose of the publicity ? Aggrandizement ? Or to get more public money ? Or what ?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bud ... you should be more suspicious of the rich and powerful. I'm here to help you see behind the propaganda ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  9. you got it Bman......they want publicity for the cause........how do you think i heard about the Red program?

    who cares if they are doin it for personal publicity..or aggrandizement......who cares!!......all i care about is if even i can maybe change or save 1 life

    no one is saying this is the 'best' or 'worst' charity......there are many many many charities..........you are free to pick one of your choice ( or not --- no one is forced to give to charity)....and even if one does not give to charity doesn't make u a bad person....it's a free country


    but to bash them...or puke at their efforts....come on?


    PS....i know for a fact that a starving and sick child in africa doesn't care what Gates or Dell's motives are......they just want a meal or some medication to improve their lives

    ReplyDelete
  10. sorry Bud, but when the wealthy want me to kiss their butts, I turn away and puke.

    ReplyDelete
  11. A wealthy person doing good things with their resources should be humble and not seek adoration.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sheesh more wild beefer stomping ... BTU was crushed, now roaring. Ditto RIG, DO.

    ReplyDelete
  13. becausue they are black...LMAOOOOO.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The events in South Africa shows waht will happen everywhere if Kyoto crypto-fascism is imposed.

    Massive job losses, turmoil, rationing of power, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Bunkerman...see the money coming out of retail and fins heading toward the laggers, some you have noted...you know this is a bounce with limits...QQQQ 46.67...IWM 72.07...SPY 137.88...the test might even come next week since everyone thinks we rally into the Fed...trusting Ben has been dead wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I have to stick with my thinking on where stocks will be in 12 months. Trading around costs me money LT.

    I have some reserves ready.

    I think a lot of this is beefer stomping with some real buying.

    ReplyDelete
  17. bears are running out of reasons to screech. Weak holders are long gone.

    ReplyDelete
  18. MLF59...flipped half that SKF 106.47 for lunch money...a little aggressive yesterday.

    ReplyDelete
  19. MLF59...SKF cut in half again at 107.50...size can be a real issue for me at times and this was one of those times...profit taker anticipation today in the fins had me to jacked up.... little Bunkerman buck fever on my part...hope your ok, I'll do better by you next time :(

    ReplyDelete
  20. well played Frosty...I am still holding 1/2....a win is a win sir...

    ReplyDelete
  21. MLF 59...RAIL 34.50, back over the 50 day...last time it did that was a great time to short...however, as for now, I think it could do a YRCW type move today perhaps to 36.25...if I get ahead my plan is to size it back so that if the fifty day fails I move on without a scratch.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Fed minimum rate for next TAF is 3.10% ... suggests a 50 bps cut at least to 3%

    ReplyDelete
  23. Bunkerman...you seem very trusting of the Fed these days for a defensive minded kinda' guy...how many votes are needed to join poole's pool to slap that beard off ben's mug?...the free cheese this week and you can bet poole is barking at the fence sitters to stop letting the markets push them around.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Fisher sounded as though he voted yes, while kicking and screaming.

    ReplyDelete
  25. ouch ... .308 for $325 per thousand. Ten years ago it was $150/K. I guess it's the price of copper and the war making the plants full up on gov't business.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Seems to me they won't want the blame if a recession starts, regardless of talk.

    Ben has Humphrey-Hawkins testimony in February.

    I do worry, though. All this "Fed was fooled" talk is troublesome.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Poole is non-voting in Jan. But we lose dove Rosengren, too.

    Fisher is 7th inning Fisher ... a real dope.

    I think Minn was one of the ones asking for the 75 bps Monday, and he votes. And Cleveland votes, too. With troubles in Cleveland, hard to see him a no. Plosser votes from Philly fed, too - with that number, had to see a no.

    There is a core of yes votes - Ben, NY Fed, Kohn, I'd toss in Warsh since he's on the Board of Governors and won't cross Ben.

    So I guess we have 7 yes votes ... more than enough to win.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I suppose a market pullback into Wdenesday would help maintain their resolve, too.

    I admit I'm nervous about them. Can they make fourth major error in six months ?

    Errors: August, October, December

    ReplyDelete
  29. thanks Bunkerman...now, those MBI AMBK types...fitch is the only one to really move with debt down grades (least taking minor action)....part of my thesis to short this bounce in the fins is the other three rating agencies would follow suit, as early as today, after the first round last firday...do further rate cuts stop that down grade cycle? I doubt anyone can act fast enough to stop them at this point, ie goverment bail outs or the ambac take over rumors....the rating agencies must move to avoid being sued to death...perhaps that triggers the retest of the lows or worse.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I listened to BAC and WB conference calls - those downgrades have little/no effect on them, even if the insurance is worth zero. That's been taken into account.

    I think there's a lot of double counting going on.

    Besides, getting downgraded to A doesn't equate to default. It just means they go into liquidation pahse.

    ReplyDelete
  31. double counting means a loss on the underlying mortgage pool is one, and a loss on the insurance on same is two - there is only one loss, just a Q on who bears it.

    ReplyDelete
  32. of course a downgrade or rumor will be s sign for the bears to attack again.

    Maybe Ambac and Mbia just go into slow liquidation ... the insurance doesn't pay until a real default adn that will take years on some of the securities. The firms don't go into receivership until they can't pay a claim.

    Buffet or Ross can buy the existing book of muni business perhaps.

    I guess all the credit default swap buyers from them would lose money. Shucks ... must be a lot of beefers in that hedging bonds.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Bunkerman...appreciate your comments and willingness to share the results of all your hard work...your alright.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Remember the beefers can make Ms. Market dance to any tune they wish for a few days or more.

    Real buyers are gunshy .. not brave at all.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Babblevision back to fearmongering ... amazing

    What should I expect, I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  36. LMAO...I resmble that last comment...though I tend to be very brave, and not all that smart, attempitng to game those beefers in large keeps the game interesting for me.

    ReplyDelete
  37. How bout some martini's Bunkerman???...Have a great weekend guys.....

    ReplyDelete
  38. ah ... yes spin ... it's almost martini time :-))

    5 PM with Louis Armstrong, the WFM and circus dogs party :-)

    WFM = World's Finest Martini.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Have a good weekend ... sheep herding Saturday PM will be fun.

    ReplyDelete