Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Vomitous*

That adjective perfectly fits the Davos World Economic Forum. I'm listening to interviews of some of its participants on Blabberg this morning. Such blather ! These certified members of the ruling classes [aka the rich & powerful] don't know anything about fields beyond their own expertise or nor anything about the lives and difficulties of the common man, yet pontificate about how the world should be run and how the lives of the common man should be ruled. By who ? Them.

They blab about bubbles. What is the one bubble rarely mentioned ? The huge flow of money from the rich to hedge funds that play trading games and disturb real economic funds flows. Do they discuss how to burst that bubble ? Nope. Why ? Because most of the participants invest in hedge funds. Or run hedge funds. Or their pals runs hedge funds.

What is the single biggest risk in the world financial markets ? Credit default swaps. ["CDS"] Those "weapons of mass destruction" permit hedge funds to speculate cheaply in the credit of many, many corporations and nations. Those also create dangerous interconnections among financial institutions that can drag the entire system down if a single large institution messes up. Who is talking about banning those ? Few. There's moi [me] and David Einhorn, the fellow who correctly analysed and anticipated the Lehman debacle. Maybe Warrren Buffet. Why ? The ruling classes like the turmoil and their hedge fund investments make money for them. AIG was a credit default swap blow-up. That should be enough to make one realize those instruments should be banned. (I'd settle for requiring 100% cash collateral for anyone writing a CDS).

Turmoil gives the ruling classes power. That's how many aristocracies were created in medieval times. The common man was forced to become a serf to buy "protection" from armed, wealthy tribal chiefs because of fear of raids and assaults. Over time, those aristocracies then gained more and more powerful from the central government and eventually destroyed the nations.

Today the lobbyists of the ruling classes are working hard in DC and the capitals of Europe to get more power over our lives and perpetuate their positions. Davos is one place they coordinate ideas and tactics. That place should be seeing huge demonstrations from the angry public. Instead, the press fawns over their access to the bosses. It's sickening and I annually, publicly rant about how I despise that forum.

Davos is strictly for the vomitorium.

Lending

Blabberg says banks aren't lending. True. But those airheads don't think why. Banks prefer to speculate or own in securities. That's where the money is going. Why ? Because their trading desks can make money AND because the regulatory rules favor securities. If a bank had to put up more Tier 1 capital to own securities - which would help underwrite the huge market value risks in them - they would shift assets towards loans they can manage better.

Of course, governments like banks to buy their debt .. as securities. Sheesh, soooo much of public comment is sheer propaganda, it's infuriating at times.

Bernanke

I support his confirmation. Battleship Ben was one crucial force in preventing a global depression. True, he was a bit slow, as readers of this blog know. But like big, slow battleships, once his salvos got going, he crushed the forces of darkness.

Besides, since he's been doing what I write for about 2.5 years, how can I complain ? He's obviously a loyal reader now ;-)

Markets

Back to my old, seven language state:
Je ne fais rien.
Ich machte nichts.
Nic nie robiÄ™.
Estoy haciendo nada.
Non faccio nulla.
Nihil facio.
I am doing nothing.

Word of the Day

"Vomitous" - adjective [$100]
Vomitous means 1. of, pertaining to, or causing vomiting; 2. (informal) repugnant, disgusting, nauseating [e. g. vomitous business methods].
Sentence: Annually viewers of the financial media are subjected to vomitous reports from Davos, as the fawning press propagates the propaganda of the ruling classes as they seek more power over the common man.

47 comments:

  1. good morning Bman !!!!!!


    excellent post ..............one of your finest efforts in awhile

    ReplyDelete
  2. i can't watch the business channels this morning................davos makin me puke.............prety funny how the media thinks ti's such abig deal


    i been watching imus and mike and mike this morning

    ReplyDelete
  3. i want Ben to stay...............but the Fed has been severely compromised


    is Ben going to have to get Congress's permission to buy office supplies now?????

    ReplyDelete
  4. yup, I switched off Davos bs too.

    ReplyDelete
  5. and Geithner i support too..............i fear obama will replace him with a university of chicago lenisist economics professor

    ReplyDelete
  6. oregon passes tax hikes................congrats frosty


    why the heck are you livin in that state ??

    ReplyDelete
  7. It troubles me that so many R's are complete idiots about Ben.

    They are the ones who defeated TARP I and cause the ensuing panic round 2.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oregon has California-itis.

    Too many California nuts moved north.

    New Hampshire has a mild case of the east coast version.

    Vermont has is bigtime.

    ReplyDelete
  9. finished watchin the rest of the M16 show last night...................Bman were you awatre the M16 was jamming up in vietnam??


    and they had issued no cleaning supplies for it..........since they thought the gas would self-clean the chamber.............a colossal mistake that caused GIs lives

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bman.....what % of your investment capital is in equities?

    ReplyDelete
  11. David Einhorn is a beefer sir...are you siding with the opinion of a beefer?

    ReplyDelete
  12. yes, I know all about that, Bud.

    The Pentagon disregarded the specs of the inventor and changed the powder formulation to one which was easier to manufacture ammo, but caused a lot more fouling.

    It wasn't the rifle.

    All that was fixed long ago.

    ReplyDelete
  13. yes, once in a blue moon, a beefer can be correct about policy matters.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "why the heck are you livin in that state ??"...uh because it is as far from u flaazzholes I can get without going five-o...I should "knock your teeth out".

    ReplyDelete
  15. Krypto Fund target specs (most of my capital) are 25% US stocsk, 20% foreign (1/3 each pacific, europe and emerging), 15% reat estate (2/3 TIAA real estate, 1/3 vanguard REITS, 5% gold (about 1/3 is Vanguard precsious metal sfunds, the rest bullion or gold+silver ETFs), 12.5% TIPs, 22.5% fixed income (mostly defered annuity type) like TIAA or whole life).

    I am 55 years old; a few years ago I had a bit more stocks and real estate. I have some income real estate on the side not included in Krypto Fund.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 1-2-3 Fund is NOT included in thsoe numbers; but Fido Fund and Sky Fund are.

    ReplyDelete
  17. right now, Krypto Fund has a good bit of cash awaiting better prices on TIPs. TIPs is underweight.

    The rest are close to the norms.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I hope that answers ur question mav

    ReplyDelete
  19. Bunkerman I hear John Meriwhether is opening another hedge fund...perhaps you should allocate some of your risk capital there...isnt he good friends with your Harvard buddy Myron Scholes?

    ReplyDelete
  20. I had the class with Fischer Black, not Myron Scholes. Have never seen nor spoken to Myron Scholes. For disclosure, I did have a class with Robert Merton who was involved in the LTCM debacle.

    re my investing in a hedge fund, Mrs. B has orders to have me committed if I ever did that.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Bunky...you never did answer Ace yesterday...have you ever been in a brawl...nono ring with pillowhands...nono bitchslap in the halls of pakiprep Salstyle...locked up with a real man with bad intentions.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I was in fights as a boy.

    Not as adult.

    ReplyDelete
  23. lolol ring with pillow hands.

    it didn't feel like a pillow taking a hard right hand .. or even a stiff jab.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Bunky...are you anticipating anything investor freindly to come from your commander and chief tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  25. just one follow up question...as a boy, when a kid would tap out, would you provide him a couple extra statement shots to emphasize your dominance, send a message.

    ReplyDelete
  26. re "investor friendly", nope.

    the best investors can hope for is to be forgotten.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Bunky...hearing the cool thing to do is have the new iPad for ever room of your house...being a slave to trends I assume you are down.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Bunkerman are you a bull on China?

    Or am I the only believer?

    ReplyDelete
  29. i am a huge bull on china..............actually ............i'm a huge bull on the spx too

    ReplyDelete
  30. I am interested in the iPad as something to carry around the house easily to do minor computer things like check email, instead of going to my office.

    ReplyDelete
  31. re China, what do you mean, being a bull on it ?

    I expcet it to grow rapidity for awhile, then have trouble due to the dictatorship running it.

    I also expect soon a confrontation over its currency, which will come from both Europe and the US.

    ReplyDelete
  32. around the house ?? are you f'ng kidding me ??


    what was that word we had for a common man with simple tastes ??


    my ass

    ReplyDelete
  33. I suspect they are building much that is worthless and wasteful and stupid.

    China will have its up & downs in an uptrend.

    That dictatorship is the big unknown.

    Its use of cyber attacks, etc.

    very dangerous they will miscalculate.

    ReplyDelete
  34. just remebered


    'epicurean' my ass



    PS.........what common man walks around his house with an I-pad ?? you gonna put that in a man-purse Bman ?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Bunkerman would you buys Chinese equities today for a 3yr hold?

    ReplyDelete
  36. Bud me and you baby....chinlee!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  37. actually, I would put it on the bar in my "Sword Room" to check things insted of walking to my office.

    Also, I think Mrs. B might want one to read with & do email when watching a movie with me - she seems able to do two things at once, unlike me.

    Yup, mav, will buy two.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I would not buy China stocks except as part of an asset allocation.

    I see no reason to overweight them.

    ReplyDelete
  39. What are the odds Dennis Kucinich can do 1 pull up?

    ReplyDelete
  40. a common man with a few extravagent/elegant tastes is an epicurean.

    Like a common man who splurges on sushi twice a week ... and drinks $500/bottle scotch

    ReplyDelete
  41. a common man with a few extravagent/elegant tastes is an epicurean.

    Like a common man who splurges on sushi twice a week ... and drinks $500/bottle scotch


    "vomitous" indeed.....

    oh man thats a grand slam sir...

    ReplyDelete
  42. I never said I was an ascetic, just an epicurean.

    I still sweep out my own garage, etc. Bought and cooked myself a roasting chicken for $1.49/lb.

    make my own scones, cornbread muffins, etc.

    Even fry my own eggs on the weekend.

    And still like peanut butter & jelly sandwiches.

    ReplyDelete
  43. vomitous lmaoooooooooooooooooooooo


    that is a f'ng grand slam!!!!!!!..............Bman you got taken over the green monster

    ReplyDelete
  44. uh Sal...don't you have a Prowler to polish.

    ReplyDelete