Friday, April 9, 2010

The Optimal Political Economic System

In Socratic dialectics, a dialogue between two sides occurs and over its course it may be resolved with new insights. Aristotle argued for the correct, virtuous optimum as being a balance between two extremes. In Hegelian dialectics, a thesis gives rise to its reaction, the antithesis. The two conflict and are resolved in a new synthesis. And then ... Bunkerman in his two posts on "The Way the World Works" (see October 27, 2009 and January 28, 2010) argues the world - microscopically and macroscopically - is an optimal combination of two or more states optimized considering all possible paths in space and time and ... people.

After four days of posts that critically analysed Capitalism and Socialism by examining and describing the Good and the Bad parts of each system, now is the time to synthesize the findings into a golden mean - a virtuous system that is created by combining the two systems into one that can optimize the aggregate happiness of all people. That is the object.

By breaking down Socialism and Capitalism into their extreme good and bad parts, the reconstruction of a better system is rather easy. We simply take the good parts and eliminate bad parts. As the old Bing Crosby song goes, "... accentuate the positive, eliminate the negative ..."

1. Start with Capitalism - we extract its pure Libertarian core as a starting system. This gives us its economic freedom to find the best way to do & combine resources of people and things, and its motivational and innovational strengths. The Good of Capitalism is kept.

2. Add governmental restrictions - limits, taxes, intergenerational (temporal) transfers - on the wealth and power of persons (natural and corporate) at some high level. This firmly prevents aristocracies from forming. The Bad of Capitalism is eliminated.

3. Use the funds & resources from #2 to fund help to the poor, unlucky or marginalized persons and for limited common shared benefits. This gives us the Good of Socialism: a sense of community support and reduced the risk for all.

4. Add hard, legal - including constitutional limits - on the power of government and its ruling classes. This eliminates the Bad of Socialism.

That is the optimum system of political economics - and lo and behold, we see it matches Fraternal Libertarianism as derived independently from simple axioms - see blog post of January 29, 2010. The robust nature of the superiority of Fraternal Libertarianism to both Capitalism and Socialism is strongly supported by the fact of our having derived this system from two different, independent techniques.

Fraternal Libertarianism is the goal we all should work toward ... bit by bit ... incrementally. Fraternal Libertarianism is complete freedom for the common man, tough restrictions on the rich & powerful ruling classes, and support for the poor, unlucky and marginalized people - a strong safety net - and limited common shared benefits. If we can get momentum and keep it towards national and worldwide Fraternal Libertarianism, the US and the world will become a better place for humanity and all its peoples.

Word of the Day

"Conflate" - verb [$10]
Conflate means to combine into one whole (two variant texts for examples).
Sentence: Conflation of the Capitalism and Socialism and concomitant nullification of their Bad parts, leaves the Good parts of both; the resultant unified system is the optimal system for human political economics: Fraternal Libertarianism.

43 comments:

  1. good morning Bman!!!!!!!


    and what a fine morning it is .......................2 glasses of chivas 12yr doin the job

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bunk doing a lil fishin today..lol..nice

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bman have you seen this chart ??



    http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/04/anatomy-of-a-crash-2009-vs-1907/


    your thoughts please

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bman can you reccomend a book at rich man's panic 1907?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bman did you read daniel henninger in the wsj about youth unemployment in the US ?? quite startling

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bman can civilians own bunker busters ?? i tivo'd a program about them last nite on history channel..............saw a few minutes..........very interesting



    PS..........that's the Lock and Load with R Lee Ermey series............it's very good

    ReplyDelete
  7. hey frosty......do you people consider dan gable a national hero ??

    ya'know.......since he's a fag...........uhhhh..........i mean wrestler

    ReplyDelete
  8. Is verdacity's email address genuine or was it a subliminal message?

    daft.prick at gmail dot com

    looool

    ReplyDelete
  9. that was a legit address - I sent a message from a "specail" email I keep and he replied. I need to send him a reply, but will do it this weekend.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I don't remember a specific book on that, Bud - I've so many books on all the panics from the panic of 1819 to the Great Depression.

    ReplyDelete
  11. no re bunker bustrers. They are strict limit on civilian possession of explosives. They are called "Destructive Devices" and must be registered with ATF.

    ReplyDelete
  12. no re youth unemployment - I'm sure its horrible. Summer jobs are gettign impossible.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I read those types of article on weekends in the "paper" newspaper.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think the comparison is meaningful since "a panic's a panic" - much caused by human emotions, once trioggered.

    I think the Panic of 1907 was not the "Rich Man's Panic", btw. That was 1903.

    1907 was a real economic event for all.

    And ... maybe he reads this blog ?

    ReplyDelete
  15. latest vegas odds


    lee westwood now 7-1..............hunter mahan now 66-1

    ross fisher knocked out

    ReplyDelete
  16. so let me get this straight....dan gable is a fag...and "jim" is your hero? and they say America is in trouble? oh man....

    ReplyDelete
  17. yeah dan gable is a fag..............why???? ........i have a very simple observation

    if 2 men are wearing underwear only.........and are roliing around on a mat............grabbing clutching holding sweating..................in my book ....those 2 are fags..............i don't see the confusion or ambiguity



    am i wrong ??? can someone tell mw where i am wrong ???

    ReplyDelete
  18. don't answer that ace................unless you further want to implicate yourself

    ReplyDelete
  19. feather...taking profits in CASY...not bad for 7 minutes work..well done indeed

    ReplyDelete
  20. If you saw Dan Gable walking down the street, would you call him a fag to his face?


    that's what I thought.....go hide in the tank son

    ReplyDelete
  21. uh .. Bud: "He [Dan Gable] resides in Iowa City with his wife Kathy and has four daughters, Jenni Mitchell, Annie Gavin, Molly and Mackenzie and four grandchildren, Gable, Danny, Jake and Elsie.


    Guess you are wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  22. not that there's anything wrong with that...

    No, no, of course not! People's personal sexual preferences are

    nobody's business but their own!

    ReplyDelete
  23. lmaooooooo Bman



    please read my 'very simple observation' for clarification

    ReplyDelete
  24. another westwood mush...he might as well toss the sticks in the rental and head to the airport...there is always next week.

    ReplyDelete
  25. RPC

    Nailed it!!!!

    danke vielmals Tommy!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  26. wow frosty.......what a witty address..............you are so F'ng funny...............hahahahahahahahahahahaha


    F'ng douche prick motherF'er

    ReplyDelete
  27. CASY....holy cow!!!

    How did you know Bob? How did you know that was coming? Oh my word....it is an unreal feeling to make money on every single trade!!!

    ReplyDelete
  28. last of the nazistyle posts...thank goodness...Mrs B must have had it with the goose stepping around the sword room....feed the sausageking...it's only a matter of time.

    ReplyDelete
  29. frosty, has anyone ever called you a philistine ?

    ReplyDelete
  30. frosty, has anyone ever called you a sodomite ??

    ReplyDelete
  31. uh Sal...only once.............. momapaki...HOOOOWWWWWWWWUUUUUUUU

    ReplyDelete
  32. Bud have you ever walked acres and acres of raw land son?

    ReplyDelete
  33. ace do you have a poster of dan gables in your bedroom ?? do you spank it to that queer ??

    ReplyDelete
  34. frosty, have you ever been called a butt-pirate ??

    ReplyDelete
  35. Bunky...your pal bove out today saying break up value of BAC $53...making worth more than MSFT AAPL XOM WMT combined...that enough for u to poke your snout out of the permabear cave and sniff a lil reality.

    ReplyDelete
  36. lee westwood in the lead by himself


    what's that frosty ?? huh ?? nuthin ?? yeah you better stay quiet...............F'ng douchebag

    ReplyDelete
  37. Bud do you have a big screen tv in every room of your house?

    ReplyDelete
  38. Spin gives ya RPC and that's how you act...you need to get out of the tank and get your soul back.

    ReplyDelete
  39. more big fin bashing on cnbc Bunky...u know your newnaziparty might get some legs...will both men and women be required to grow those lil hitler mustaches sir.

    ReplyDelete
  40. chill those bunktinis...have a good weekend bunky...hope I did beat u up to bad...cya next week.

    ReplyDelete
  41. I think I need a septalingual drinking toast. Maybe Monday.

    Have a good weekend all.

    ReplyDelete