Monday, June 9, 2008

Poorer

I still remember the lecture on the oil price increases of 1973 and 1979-1980 in the business economics class at MIT's Sloan School of Management. This was 1979 and its effects were still being felt. The professor simply said that such an increase in the price of an important, irreplaceable (in the short term) raw material was going to make everyone poorer. There was no way around it - poorer. Those oil price increases were quite sudden. The current wave of oil price increases are occurring over a few years - from a monthly chart, oil prices broke out in 2004 at $40/barrel and the trend has been up ever since.

The professor said there were two outcomes from a sudden oil price spike: recession or inflation. The inflation occurs if the central bank monetizes the oil price increase. A third outcome exists in a steady price rise: a slowdown. I note that hourly earnings are nearly flat in real terms. But productivity was up about 2.5%. So what's going on ?

The gains in productivity are being used to pay for the higher cost of oil, not to increase the standard of living of the common man. Coupled with the continued avarice of the ruling classes, the common man is experiencing a decline in his standard of living as he must work harder and learn new skills to stay even.

Ruling Classes

These hogs are continuing to create trouble for the common man. I heard this morning from an analyst in Europe that for five years there has been an aversion to investing in equity. The beefers*, who were getting all the funds flows, instead heavily played in spread products, creating the debt bubble and the current credit crises. And they are playing in commodities. Together with their friends/clients in the pension funds, they are buying oil futures. Not investing to find more oil. Just buying futures and swaps. For every buyer there is a seller - that is a truism in any derivative product.

Who are the sellers in oil futures/swaps ? There is a limited universe of strong sellers: oil companies with oil in the ground. But they limit how much oil they will sell forward. OPEC and other governments don't sell oil in the forward markets. So this stampede of money into commodities has overwhelmed those derivative markets. That's the cause of this oil price increase since $100. Anyone saying that's not possible simply hasn't done the math. I did a quick calculation last Friday and it's rather easy to prove this flood of pension and beefer money into the oil derivative markets can overwhelm them.

I have no problem with pension funds investing in real assets, but futures are NOT real assets. If a pension fund wants to own oil, it should buy physical oil in the ground, as they do for timber - they buy forests. Or invest in drilling and other real, physical oil investments - that creates more supply. So the old rules against pension funds speculating in futres should be reinstated. Bring back the "unrelated business income tax" for these activities. And beefers must be regulated stringently.

*big, evil funds.

Markets

Ugh. Obviously the markets can't sustain a bullish trend until the upper limit to oil prices is known for the intermediate term.

Hmmm ... I see Goldman, Sachs is building a new, palatial corporate headquarters with six huge trading floors. See my blog post of june 4 for "Truisms", #1. Perhaps this will signal a top in this unholy focus on "trading" as a source of income. How unproductive is that ? Nothing is created by that huge human activity of talented people. They just try to skim money off their institutional clients. What a despicable business for a corporation !

Word of the Day

"Congener" - noun [$10]
Congener means 1. a thing or person of the same kind or category as another, esp. animals or plants of a specified genus; 2. (esp. US) a by-product giving a distinctive character to a wine or spirit.
Sentence: Huge Wall Street firms that focus huge capital and effort in trading, such as Goldman Sach, are simply gargantuan congeners of the beefers. They must be heavily regulated to prevent them harming the common man with their shenanigans.

53 comments:

Bud said...

Dear Sal,


I want to thank you for taking the time to visit my campaign website, www.JohnMcCain.com. In addition, thank you so much for your generous contribution of $250.00.

As this campaign progresses, I look forward to working with you as we continue to build an unmatched campaign organization. Your support today will help me recruit more people to our effort and allow me to continue my straight-talking conversation with America's voters. Our country is the finest nation and greatest force for good in the world, and I'm honored by your confidence in me to lead further into the 21st century.

My family has long believed in the highest honor one can gain is through service to our country. I served in the company of heroes in US Navy. I was a proud foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution in the House of Representatives; and in the Senate, I have consistently fought for smaller government, fiscal responsibility, and a strong national defense. I am confident that I can lead this country as the next President of the United States and I will be straightforward with the American people about what I think is right for our country.

I honestly believe that our best days lie ahead, and together, we can forge a better future for our families and our country.

I am honored that you have chosen to stand with me at this very important time, and I am truly grateful for your friendship and support.

Sincerely,

John McCain

Bud said...

officially on board the john mccain train

started with 250bux.......i will max out to him prolly around the convention

no way i want to see the jew and white hating bigot Obama in the white house

Bud said...

this is the first time in my life i have contributed to a republican pres candidate

in fact i am 98% sure i have never given to any pres candidate not named clinton

i gave to bill both times......i know i did not give to kerry.......but i am not 100% sure about gore......i don't think i gave him money but can't exactly remember

Bud said...

back in ft lauderdale

i saw gas between 405 and 420 for unleaded regular

Bunkerman said...

Too bad about Hillary .. she was truly a much better potential president than "The Speech".

Hmmm... betrayed by the far left, I'd say.

Bunkerman said...

I read an article about earmarks in my hometown newspaper - 11,000 in the recent bill for $15 billion. And all payoffs for contributors/supporters.

Such looting - avarice - cupidity - thieves.

Bud said...

wait a second

what is tha goal of a pension fund?? to make as much money as possible for the fund.......the more they make......the better a life for the retirees...aka...'the common man'

if they canmake the most money in stamp collecting....so be it......don't restrict the managers

mern said...

wow, bud bought all of rushs bs.

obama/ and the clintons in 08!

slick willy wants back in, and VP gud enuff for him

u watch!

oil up 11 bucks
corn all time new hi
unemployment biggest spike in 22 yrs.

NA THIS ISNT STAGFLATION.

well if u live in a vacum or bunker. short of that, and less than 5 mil NW. U R MIRED IN STAGFLATION.

i literally saw a guy get into with another guy at a gas station. this one guy was filling up his hummer. and this poor white trash was yelling at him that it was his fault gas was 415 for regular.

my fave watering hole was EMPTY friday nite. the owner was freaking out, to me.

worden now says cali is quickly catching up with michigan, as it really starts to unravel there.

LEH is done.

mid cycle slowdown.

stagger lee gets madder by the day. hildgo gave up on prez before bman gave up on mid cycle slow down. actually pretty surprised by that.

bud your girl is right. the differences between barrack and hildog r very small compared to i want a 100 yr war that can not be won (without glass) and continuing to practice no fiscal restrainment. keep the lobbyists happy. its just 4 more yrs of bush, but a little older and a little more honest.

u r being too emotional about your vote becuase your bitch lost, which i told u wud happen in feb, when i predicted obama as the lock in november.

think of it like a stock, remove the emotion. u r telling us, that mccain holds more of your core beliefs than barrack? then WTF were u doing supporting hillary????????????????????????????????????????????????

been watching a lot of phillies games lately, and they look really really really gud!

need 1 more strong starter, and they REALLY cud win it all this yr. what an infield. utley, rollins and chocalate nose man.

Bunkerman said...

The goal of a pension fund is to pay the retirees the amount of pension they are entitled to.

And not to take excessive risk that will cause the State or Corporation to have to put more money into it to cover the losses.

Speculating in futures (or raw land deals as CALPERS did & lost $1 billion) in not a proper means to do that.

Bunkerman said...

Hmmm .. and state pension funds are indexed to headline inflation. So they drive up the price of oil and thus drive up headline inflation, thus INCREASING THEIR LIABILITIES.

The fund is a net loser.

Bunkerman said...

CA is a car-based economy. They have to be suffering. And ditto FL & NV dependence on the traveler.

TX will hurt, too - all those far-flung suburbs with McMansions.

Bunkerman said...

I just go by the facts, mern. Show me a negative GDP.

I lived through the mid-cycle slowdown in the mid 1980s. Rust belt was being destroyed by Volcker. Everyone screaming about the homeless and recession ... which never occured.

Bunkerman said...

when the facts - not anecdotes - prove I'm wrong, I'll write about my error. Not until then.

mfl59 said...

men USA-Argentina last night....you had to have been there...absolutely electric atmosphere....ignorant Americans simply don't "get" it...but they are coming around....

of course how can that event compare to the NBA Finals? (yawn)

Bunkerman said...

here's a WTF (from Briefing Live):

"Next on crunch's hit parade: corporate synthetic CDOs? - WSJ

WSJ reports investors are already paying the price for buying billions of dollars of complex securities, known as synthetic collateralized debt obligations, tied to the fate of U.S. homeowners. Now, they may be in for some unpleasant surprises from the much larger market for similar investments linked to the credit-worthiness of companies. All but nonexistent a decade ago, synthetic CDOs grew popular in recent years, especially in Europe, as a way for insurance cos, banks and hedge funds to invest in a diversified portfolio of cos without actually buying their bonds. While the investments have stabilized since suffering with the broader credit markets earlier this year, some analysts are warning of more trouble ahead. The problem: Most corporate synthetic CDOs are linked to the debt of U.S. cos, some of which are looking a lot shakier amid an economic slowdown. To make matters worse, some credit-rating experts burned by the subprime-mortgage crisis are taking a closer look at the way they rated synthetic CDOs. That could trigger downgrades in the $6 trillion market, forcing some investors to sell their securities or at least post significant losses... Banks and insurance cos, such as AIG and AXA, snapped up highly rated pieces.

a synthetic CDO ... arghhh.

Bunkerman said...

Who in their right mind would buy such a mutant ?

Bunkerman said...

MCD Mc Donald's reports May same store sales +7.7% vs +3.6% Briefing.com consensus (56.95 )

guess my DQPwCh buying is showing up ;-)

mern said...

mfl, where more people wearing and routing for the blue and white or the red white and blue? saw a game vs equador down here is was about 50/50.

bman stagger lee is not saying recession. stagger lee says the economy grows below 2% while inflation is over 5%. the cpi is a crock, and now that opinion is in the majority. when we first debated this, probably, late 05, was anyone questions the govt data on inflation other than a few perma bears?

santelli just made many gud points, imo.

peace

mern said...

so what i continue to believe, but dont play it....... is the tape is in the process of contracting its pe ratio given stagflation vs what we had for about 20 something yr was disinflation.

and in those 20 yrs, we got fatter, bigger cars and DUMBER. while the rest of the world got bigger and smarter.

barrack or big mac cant fix this shit.

i was like 3 and 4 in 73-74, but with the leh news today stocks seems to be down pretty solid for the 8 or 9 months.

18 more to go? range bound or break MLK lows?

mfl59 said...

men Italy-Netherlands today at 245 est.....are you serious? how does it get any better?

Mern I'd say it was pretty close to a 50-50 split in the crowd....

Bud said...

funny how people like mern expect the president of the US to 'fix' everything

we are a free market cpaitalist society.......only in a marxist socialist system does the govt 'control' society

there is no govt solution to all our problems

govt's job is to create an environment where the private sector can deal with our issues


PS.....sounds like santelli callin for increases regulation in the credit and commosity markets....ugh

mfl59 said...

Bud Wayne Root would applaud your patriotism....an American who believes in America....

wwww.rootforpresident.com

Bud said...

weird how the Bman doesn't support democrats for congress

alan abelson says the next congress will be the most aggressive on craacking down and in passing regulations on wall street since the 1930's

i agree 10000% with him

nancy pelosi with a 60-70 seat majosity in the house....she will be more powerful than the president


watch out wall street

the liberals are coming !! the liberals are coming !!

Bud said...

charlie rangel and barney frank


wall street can't even 'bribe' them with campaign contributions.......they are in ultra safe districts....both win in 75% landslides

Bunkerman said...

Their other nefarious plans rule them out for my support, such as taxing me too much to fund their power-grabs & payoffs.

I'm a populist libertarian, not a socialist.

Spin-em said...

USA 0-Argentina 0

thrilling!!!!!

OMG!!!!! WE'VE LANDED ON THE MOON!!!

mfl59 said...

A partnership that involves the nation's largest pension fund and owns 15,000 acres of land outside of Los Angeles has filed for bankruptcy-court protection, representing one of the biggest land deals to sour amid the housing bust. The Chapter 11 filing by LandSource Communities Development LLC late Sunday is a potentially costly and embarrassing blow for the venture's main investor, the California Public Employees' Retirement System, known as Calpers. The bankruptcy filing in federal court in Delaware means Calpers could lose much of its $970 million investment in the venture, which it made through an investment vehicle in February 2007, only months before land values plunged. At the time, the venture's assets were appraised at about $2.6 billion. Earlier this year, the value had shrunk to $1.8 billion.

Bunkerman said...

hmmm ... zero-zero aka nil-nil. That must be a soccer score. Just a guess ;-)

mfl59 said...

do you still own BHP bunkerman?

Bunkerman said...

The problem with that "stagflation" label is the broad based "inflation" isn't happening.

Just oil, grains, etc.

Core is correct.

Average Joe is just poorer from where he would be is oil was $40, corn $3. All productivity goe sto pay for the higher oil ... and the ruling classes.

I guess I need a catchy phrase.

Bunkerman said...

no sold last of that a long while ago. I didn't like the China push-backs, etc. Or focus on RTP acquisition.

Was too early, but had 100% gain LT

Frosty said...

Bunkerman...the MLK and saint patty lows spurred by 75 bps of Fed juice...what turns the tide now?

Bunkerman said...

I was making choices on what to keep & what to sell ... I think I made some poor choices then.

Bunkerman said...

oil crapping out as demand falls by a lot and end of China stockpiling for Olympics.

Bunkerman said...

Also I expect a decline in home defaults soon.

Frosty said...

Bunkerman...dallas fed fisher on cnbc today...tune in and find out how wrong you are about inflation, thiink he will open your eyes...he speaks with the voice of the comman man.

Bunkerman said...

uh .. hasn't he been wrong-way Corrigan for a few years ?

Frosty said...

I hate fisher...just wanted to see how weak your swing was today...tap back to the mound, one down.

Bud said...

who/what is Corrigan???

Bunkerman said...

Sheesh budster ... Google "Wrong Way Corrigan"

Bunkerman said...

going to dentist :-((

Frosty said...

uh Bunkerman...market selling as fisher speaks.

Bud said...

France - romania on espn2

i always root for the french....my faves......second choice....holland


i was a huge michel platini fan

also johann cruyff

mfl59 said...

You know, we don’t mind it when speculators drive up the price of our stock portfolios. And we didn’t complain when speculators made our house values rise.

However, now that (arguably) speculators are said to be driving up the price of oil, we hear the outcries of outrage and the call for more regulation on energy trading. “Speculator” becomes a bad word all of a sudden and said speculators are evil and must be stopped. So many are saying at least.

But let’s take a deep breath. What has always happened after speculative forces have driven the price of stocks too high? Eventually they corrected to reasonable levels (and beyond.) And what about the recent speculation-driven housing boom? It busted.

If a price movement is purely driven by speculators, at some point the market will do what the market does and the aberrant price will normalize. If on the other hand the reasons for the movement of a market are fundamentally rather than speculatively based, then all of the grumbling and grousing about speculators is shown to be irrelevant.

If skyrocketing oil is the fault of speculators time will work it out, and some of the speculators will be burned. The risk we run is that in pointing fingers at market participants and blaming them for energy prices, we end up having our attention diverted from the fundamental issues that need to be addressed – energy exploration, governmental policy, energy conservation, improving energy efficiency and most importantly the need to develop energy technology and alternative energy sources to ultimately make oil a much less critical commodity.

Spin-em said...

mfl going for the Shrute award....

mfl59 said...

www.rootforpresident.com

get on board men.....

Bunkerman said...

That's sophistry, mfl. Typical libertarian theoretical nonsense that ignores the dynamical aspects of the economy, viz., how many firms/people get badly hurt by the speculators or pension funds trying to buy all the oil in the world.

What is there to force a bursting, except a big drop in demand, that ipso facto is the pain of the common man being felt.

Libertarians love to let the beefers & ruling classes play with the common man and always poiint to "theories" why is should be permitted.

Libertarianism must be tempered with populism to protect the average Joe from the predators to preservd a peaceful society and prevent worse responses, like socialism.

Bunkerman for President !!!

mfl59 said...

its a zero sum game sir....for every loser there is a winner....

Bud said...

loooooooooooooool


did the Bman just swing and miss at mfl's circle-change??

mfl59 said...

lmaoooo....bunkerman is awfully jumpy in the batters box....

Bud said...

JPM MS gettin tattooed

oh...what the heck......

american banks are a sham

their balance sheets are a house of cards

their income statements are a ponzi scheme


armageddon is coming

Bunkerman said...

in the derivatives, true ... but not in the effects.

Bunkerman said...

that was a solid base hit on that "zero-Sum" inside corner pitch :-)